Paper 4 Final

Link to Final Paper 4
http://www.scribd.com/doc/85146601

My paper is discussing the amount of money school districts have and with the amount of money your district has affects what technological advancements your students can receive. The teaching staff also plays a major role in the students educational understandings of their literacy opportunities. I supported this evidence from showing points of a variety of authors that took on different stances on the issue. I supported this claim by showing many points that prove that money isn't everything and that you don't need money to have a good school good schools are based on the teachers money just helps improve students educational opportunities. The counter arguments that I tried to bring into my article was the fact that people are admit on technology being the center of education and they should focus on the basic fundamentals and than tie in technology and not to ambush students into the world of technology. But also that all of my sources have different views on the topics related to money within a school, the technological advancements, the teaching staff, and students home life. After my peer edit I took into consideration adding in a few paragraphs to talk more about the counter arguments and more about the objections to my topic. I also re-arranged some of my sentences, removed some sentences, and edited some of my sentences. After the peer edit I feel as if my paper flows better together and that the overall structure of my paper has improved.