When reading academic articles rhetoric falls into place because the author is trying to get you to see there point of view from the article and not anyone else.
1. Kantz contends that facts are actually claims such as what you read in a textbook, opinions are what one person believes or thinks based on disagreements and arguments, and arguments are all claims because everyone has their own opinion about a certain situation or argument.
2. Many students misunderstand sources because they read them as stories
- I disagree with this because I think that students know how to site there sources when they read them they just don't know how to always correctly cite them.
- I definitely think this is true because students always expect everything they read to be true and you can't always trust what you are reading to always be correct.
- I believe this statement to be true because the authors are trying to get the students to only see one side of the story and not all the sides.
6. Yes after reading this Kantz has shown me that you can not take what information you are given and hold it to the highest of standards you need to look around and find a variety of information because different authors will try and get you to only believe one side and not the others.
Meta Moment
Constructs are things built around peoples ideas and concepts are things people already have opinions about. It is useful to understand her findings and claims because she is showing you a different view about writing and how to write based on what we have done in the past and knowing that not everything you read is a fact and that it can not be taken for all that it is worth.
Remember to briefly summarize the articles (the Rosenberg as well as the Kantz) before proceeding to the questions, and please remember to add a paragraph of your own thoughts about the ideas from the articles connecting them to your own past and future experiences.
ReplyDeleteI like this where you say "you can't always trust the facts that you are given and take them for everything because they are only worth face value yes there can be good information in the material but it is not always true." I'm glad that idea came through clear.
If "facts" are claims (so everything is a claim in some way) how do we arrive at accurate knowledge? What can we do to make sure we have the best "facts"?